27 March 2005
COMIT Case Study 8: Taylor Woodrow
- Author: COMIT
- Document type: Case Study
- Published: 27 March 2005
Snagging data was received and processed by sub-contractors days after the snags had originally been identified and recorded on-site. This was due to identified snags having to be typed up and then issued to sub-contractors in writing. This was causing delays to projects at a vital time - i.e. at the end of the project, when most snags are found and rectified. It is widely acknowledged that delays to contracts when handover is due can be very costly. .